Tentang Katalog
Jelajah
Our nation-wide data is massive, and sometimes it’s hard to find the data you’re looking for. Search by topic keywords or pick a place/location. Read MoreCari Fakta
Topics are broken down by categories. We’ll be adding more of these pages in the next few months, so let us know if there are topics you’d like to see us explain. Read MoreVisualkan
We want to help you tell great stories. Maps and distribution charts help uncover what’s interesting, so you can take it from there. Read MoreTemukan Konteks
Pre-computed statistics are presented alongside each data point, so you can see how each place fits into a larger context. Read MoreINFORMASI PUBLIK
YANG PERLU MASYARAKAT KETAHUI
Kami menyediakan berbagai informasi publik terkait perencanaan kebijakan di berbagai sektor sebagai bentuk dukungan terhadap transparansi data. Masyarakat dapat pula mengajukan permohonan informasi yang dibutuhkan apabila informasi tersebut belum tersedia.
Informasi Setiap Saat
Informasi Berkala
Informasi Serta Merta
Focus Area
-
Kerjasama Penelitian
Komunikasi penelitian kebijakan yang berkualitas lebih baik dan lebih efektif
-
Alokasi Anggaran
Alokasi anggaran yang lebih besar dan lebih baik untuk mendukung penelitian kebijakan
-
Data & Aksesibilitas
Manajemen, ketersediaan, dan aksesibilitas data dan informasi yang lebih baik untuk pembuatan kebijakan
Challenge
ARK aims to address underlying barriers holding back Indonesia's knowledge sector. These barriers hamper both the production and use of quality evidence to inform policymaking.
Funding for research and efficiency of spending
Public funding for research is relatively low compared to other low middle income countries. Clearer research agendas are slowly improving the way funding is spent and aligning research with policymakers' needs, but there is still a long way to go. The private sector currently contributes a very small proportion of all funding for research.The research environment
The research environment is over regulated.The government agencies responsible for research don't always coordinate well and often have overlapping functions. A significant proportion of researchers' time is spent on administration and not on actual research. Procurement rules make it difficult for policymakers to commission research.Demand for research
Policymakers are often under pressure to roll out policies quickly, without adequate research, and research isn't always a formal requirement. Funds for commissioning research are limited and policymakers' attitudes towards research vary. There is little demand for research on gender and social inclusion, and limited understanding of how to address these issues in policymaking.Quality of research and analysis
Universities don't provide adequate research training and peer review isn't a common practice. Lecturers and researchers receive low salaries, leading to "brain drain". Academics are rewarded for teaching or administration rather than research. Policy analysis skills in government are limited.Availability and accessibility of data
Data isn't shared between government agencies and data systems aren't well-integrated. Only a small amount of government data is shared publicly. Regulations, policies and procedures on data collection, classification, quality, privacy and protection are weak. Gender and social inclusion issues aren't considered in data collection and analysis.Links between researchers and policymakers
Connections between researchers and policymakers often depend on personal networks and interaction is mostly informal and irregular. Policy-relevant research isn't readily available to policymakers and research findings aren't communicated in accessible ways, with actionable policy recommendations.Expected Outcomes
Better Mechanism
There are better mechanisms for funding policy research, and funding is linked to the research needs of policymakers.
Better Incentives
Researchers and academics in universities have better incentives to do high-quality policy research.
Better Sharing
Researchers, policy analysts, and policymakers are engaging with each other more regularly to share knowledge, engage in policy dialogue and do joint research.
Better Quality
Quality data on development planning, budgeting and performance is more available and accessible and data systems are better linked to each other.
More Contribution
Research organisations are increasingly financially sustainable and making an important contribution to evidence-informed policy in Indonesia.
Gender Equality and Social Inclusion
Policymakers need better access to research and information on inequality and exclusion and the different impacts that policies have on women and socially excluded groups. Ark-KSI's work on gender equality and social inclusion aims to improve the use of evidence on gender and social inclusion issues in development policymaking. Read More
Sub-national engagement
Local governments in Indonesia have significant responsibility for developing and implementing policy. Although Ark-KSI's work is mostly focused at the national level, the program is working through existing partners and their networks to strengthen the supply of policy research and analysis to local governments and improve the use of data for local development planning and budgeting. Read More
Engagement with the media
Although Indonesia has a vibrant media landscape, there is a shortage of evidence-informed analysis on important public policy issues in the Indonesian media. ARK is working with selected media partners to promote more evidence-informed public debate on policy issues and raise awareness of the importance of using evidence in making policy decisions. Read MoreKey Role
Initiator
Getting new ideas on the agenda, generating debate, identifying and promoting examples of positive deviance, and demonstrating and testing new ideas.Connector & Aligner
Bringing together interested stakeholders around key issues, encouraging or helping them to develop a shared agenda, to share knowledge and to collaborate.Critical Friend
Providing input to strengthen, develop and implement local solutions through sharing knowledge, testing ideas and encouraging stakeholders to reflect on and address emerging strategic issues.
